Impact of ultrasound limitation to assess aortitis in patients with giant cell arteritis: comparative study with FDG-PET/CT.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of ultrasound (US) intrinsic limitation to assess aortitis versus FDG-PET/CT in patients with US-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to identify factors associated with aortic involvement. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients referred to US fast-track clinics at two academic centres over a 4-year period. Only patients with GCA confirmed by US were included. Temporal arteries (TA) and extracranial arteries US were performed at baseline. FDG-PET/CT was performed according to clinician's criteria. An FDG artery uptake at the aorta higher than liver uptake was considered positive for aortitis. RESULTS: Seventy-two of 186 patients with US-proven GCA underwent an FDG-PET/CT; 29 (40.3%) had a positive FDG-PET/CT and 24 (33.3%) presented aortitis. Only 6 (20.7%) patients with positive FDG-PET/CT had negative US findings of large vessel (LV)-GCA. Among patients with aortitis in FDG-PET/CT, only two (8.3%) had negative US findings of LV-GCA. Patients with aortitis were younger (68.9 vs 81;p<0.001), more frequently females (79.2% vs 39.6%;p=0.002) and had higher platelets count (413.4 vs 311.1;p=0014). Patients with aortitis presented positive TA US less frequently (41.7% vs 83.3%;p<0.001), but more LV US involvement (91.7% vs 41.7%; p<0.001) versus patients without aortitis. None of the patients with aortitis exhibited visual symptoms (0% vs 31.2%;p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT can detect aortitis in one out of every three patients with US-proven GCA. However, a negative US examination for LV-GCA suggests a low risk of aortitis. Younger and female GCA patients with thrombocytosis, absence of visual manifestations and LV-GCA on US may more frequently present aortitis by FDG-PET/CT.

Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the new 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR giant cell arteritis (GCA) classification criteria for diagnosis in routine clinical care. METHODS: Multicentric retrospective observational study of patients referred to two ultrasound (US) fast track clinics. Patients with GCA were compared with unselected controls with suspected GCA. The gold standard for GCA diagnosis has been clinical confirmation after 6 months of follow-up. All patients underwent an US exam of temporal and extracranial arteries (carotid, subclavian and axillary) at baseline. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT was performed according to standard clinician criteria. The performance of the new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria was evaluated in all patients with GCA across different subsets of the disease. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients (188 cases, 131 controls) were included for analysis (mean age 76 years, 58.9% females). Overall, the 2022 EULAR/ACR GCA classification criteria had a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 71.8%, using GCA clinical diagnosis as external criterion and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.928 (95% CI 0.899 to 0.957). Isolated large vessel-GCA showed a sensitivity of 62.2% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.691 (0.592 to 0.790)), while biopsy-proven GCA showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.989 (0.976 to 1)). Overall sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR criteria was 53.2% and 80.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria showed adequate diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected GCA under routine care, and an improvement on the sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR classification criteria in all patient subsets.

A paradigm of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: subtypes and early identification.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple failures to biologic or targeted specific disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) that lead to difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) may be the result of multi-drug inefficacy or reflect treatment problems related to adverse events, comorbidities, and/or poor adherence. We aimed to characterise a cohort of D2TRA patients in clinical practice, to analyse the differences between D2TRA due to inefficacy versus D2TRA from other causes, and to compare them with non-D2TRA. METHODS: The D2TRA group included patients who were receiving ≥2b/tsDMARDs due to inefficacy (D2TRA-inef cacy) or because of adverse events, poor adherence, contraindications, comorbidities, drug-intolerance, etc. (D2TRA-other). Patients who achieved low disease activity or remission with the rst bDMARD were classified as non-D2TRA patients. For all patients, demographic, clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters were assessed prior to starting the rst b/tsDMARD. Descriptive analysis was performed and bivariate logistic regression models were assembled. RESULTS: In total, 253 patients were included: 131 non-D2TRA and 122 D2TRA [86 (70.5%) D2TRA-inefficacy and 36 (29.5%) D2TRA-other]. Comparison of the two groups of D2TRA patients: no differences in gender, age at start of b/tsDMARD or age at RA diagnosis were found; this was also true of socioeconomic status, frequency of anxiety-depression and other comorbidities. Patients categorised as D2TRA-other had less extra-articular manifestations than D2TRA-inef cacy, as well as lower values of DAS28 at the start of the rst b/tsDMARD. Comparisons of Non-D2TRA patients versus D2TRA-other resulted in the following observations: no differences in sociodemographic characteristics were evident nor were there any differences in terms of disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with D2TRA-other are indistinguishable from non-D2TRA patients at baseline, indicating the former cohort does not appear to have any predictive value during the early stages of b/tsDMARD treatment, unlike what occurs in patients with D2TRA-inefficacy.

Prevalencia de anticuerpos virales y reaginas luéticas en donadores de sangre de un hospital / Prevalence of viral antibodies and serology for syphilis in blood donors from a hospital

Objetivo. Establecer la prevalencia de anticuerpos virales y reaginas luéticas en una población de donadores voluntarios. Sitio. Un hospital general de tercer nivel del ISSSTE en la ciudad de Morelia, estado de Michoacán. Desde 1986 es obligatorio en los bancos de sangre de México, investigar en todos los donadores la presencia de anticuerpos contra el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (anti-VIH), antígeno de superficie del virus de la hepatitis B (Ags VHB) y reaginas luéticas (RPR); y desde 1993, es también obligatorio determinar anticuerpos contra el virus de la hepatitis C (anti-VHC). Material y métodos. En siete años (01/01/90 a 31/12/96) se obtuvieron 10,077 muestras de donadores voluntarios sanos para la determinación de anti-VIH, AgsVHB y RPR. De 01/07/92 a 31/12/96 se colectaron 7,256 muestras para investigación de anti-VHC. Resultados. Fueron positivos 19 donadores para anti-VIH (0.18 por ciento), 34 para AgsVHB (0.33 por ciento), 12 para RPR (0.11 por ciento) y 22 para anti-VHC (0.30 por ciento). Estas tasas son similares a las de otros bancos de sangre mexicanos